Two BCs for Travelling Divers
This entry was posted on 19th June 2015.
Aqualung Zuma is that little Seaquest 3D, resurrected, re-thought and adapted to include some modern innovations. Without a hard backpack, you can actually roll it up. The Zuma is for the travelling single-tank diver. It comes with an integrated-weight system but only a small pocket. You need to clip your reel and SMB to a D-ring. Not only is it very comfortable to wear but we get reports from satisfied users that because it has such generously padded shoulder straps, it's very comfortable when used without a wetsuit where the water is warm enough for that. If the Zuma is too minimalistic for you, the Cressi Travel Light BC has all the features one might reasonably expect in a conventional BC, including pockets, an integrated-weight system and trim-weight pockets but it is just as lightweight. Trim-weight pockets can be very important to have when using a floaty aluminium cylinder. I’m not the world’s best diver, but during my active instructor days I was happy to demonstrate buoyancy control using an upturned plastic bag in place of a BC. The core function of a BC is very low-tech, so you can be confident that, however much of a compromise the Travel Light might be, it does the job. The otherwise conventional looking Cressi Travel Light is made from a very lightweight nylon material, and has no hard backpack. You can actually roll it up tightly for packing, so it takes up no space, either. It even has an additional Velcro-covered strap to keep it tidy when rolled. It comes with three ways to dump air not including using the oral inflation valve at the end of the corrugated hose. Trying to strap a BC with no backpack to a cylinder by its camband could be very unsatisfactory, but both the Travel Light and the Zuma provide a second strap to stabilise the tank. The cost of a BC like these might well be recovered in excess-baggage charge savings. Don't be misled by divers who say these BCs are too fragile. I've had a Cressi Travel Light in regular use for several years and I ever use it when drysuit diving in colder waters. My wife even used it in Vancouver and in Iceland.Your BC could be the heaviest part of your diving equipment save actual tank and weights. While packing for a recent trip, I noticed that my chosen BC weighed so much that I thought it still had some lead stowed in it. With an eye on my miserable airline checked-baggage allowance, I knew I needed something less substantially made and lighter-weight. A long time ago, before many of you had taken up diving, I reviewed for Diver Magazine, where I was Technical Editor, a little compact wing from Seaquest called the 3D. It was stylish and minimalist. It was like wearing a little rucksack. The one-piece continuous harness meant that one size fitted all. Compared to other BCs available at the time, it was revolutionary. When it came to packing for a flight, it weighed in at less than 2kg. This was in the days when men were men, women made sandwiches, the BSAC ruled diving and every diver had a dual-bag BC, with an independent emergency inflation cylinder, designed for military divers and built to withstand the effects of dropping into the sea from a helicopter (not that they ever did!). My review of the rather feminine little SeaQuest 3D was suitably enthusiastic. It was one of the first bits of kit I reviewed during a 21-year career that genuinely impressed me. I was so impressed that I actually bought one, and have it to this day. It’s also ideal for single-tank drysuit diving. Alas, nobody else then seemed to agree with my findings, and few bought one. It was soon discontinued. Time passed and Seaquest BCs are now marketed under the name of the parent company, Aqualung. Times change. Far more people now see scuba diving as intrinsically linked with travel to tropical destinations, and girls go diving too! Fuel prices have risen in the interim as well, and suddenly lightweight BCs are at last finding their place. The